Why Are We Only Now Allowed to Talk About Aliens?
By John & Rachelle Moyer
Listen to the Discussion
UAPs, Hidden Agendas, and the Consciousness Conversation No One Is Having
For decades, even whispering about aliens could get you branded a conspiracy theorist. And yet, here we are: mainstream media, former military officials, intelligence insiders, and U.S. congressional hearings all openly discussing UAPs (Unidentified Aerial Phenomena).
Something has shifted.
But the deep dive here isn’t just whether aliens exist—it's how their existence is now being allowed to surface without ridicule. What changed? Who benefits from that change? And what might it reflect about our collective consciousness? This isn't about confirmation. It's about calibration. A moment of reevaluation where fear, power, and possibility all collide.
Disclosure Is No Longer Fringe
In July 2023, a House Oversight Committee hearing featured testimony from former intelligence officer David Grusch, who claimed under oath that the U.S. government is in possession of non-human craft and biologics. He alleged retrieval programs, secrecy, and even threats against whistleblowers.
Public reactions ranged from disbelief to indifference. But the shift was clear: this wasn’t Reddit. This was Congress.
Luis Elizondo, former head of the Pentagon’s Advanced Aerospace Threat Identification Program (AATIP), has also gone on record saying that UAPs are real, demonstrate technologies beyond human capability, and that secrecy has been sustained through intimidation and compartmentalization — as seen in interviews like 60 Minutes (2021) and congressional testimony during the U.S. House Oversight Hearing (July 2023).
Why Now? Who Benefits From Disclosure—or Delay?
We have to ask: why has the lid lifted now? What’s the strategic timing?
Some speculate it’s a slow-drip disclosure to avoid panic. Others believe it’s a preemptive narrative control move: better to manage the story than lose grip on it entirely. Still others warn that disclosure could be used to justify new defense budgets or psychological operations.
And there's another possibility: something changed after we lit the match.
When humanity developed nuclear weapons, we sent out more than just political signals. We sent an interdimensional flare. And that may have changed the level of attention we received.
As Robert Hastings and dozens of military whistleblowers have documented, UAPs have consistently appeared near nuclear sites, shutting down or even re-arming missile systems. This isn't fringe theory. It's repeated, documented, and declassified.
To use a metaphor: imagine if a tribe of bonobo chimpanzees in the Congo rainforest suddenly discovered how to create and wield fire—not just warming themselves, but fashioning rudimentary explosives. Would we ignore them? Unlikely. We’d study, observe, monitor—perhaps even intervene to prevent self-harm or environmental impact.
Humanity, in this scenario, is the bonobo. Nuclear technology was our flame — a leap so bold it may have echoed far beyond our planet. We didn’t just gain power. We triggered attention. Not necessarily invasion — but observation. And maybe the reason it’s taken so long to acknowledge this isn’t because it wasn’t happening… but because the implications were too massive to manage.
As philosopher and media theorist Marshall McLuhan said, “Only the small secrets need to be protected. The big ones are kept secret by public disbelief.”
If They're Real, Should We Be Afraid?
Fear is always the easiest tool for manipulation. So it’s no surprise that much of the early narrative around UAPs has emphasized military risk.
But not all insiders agree. Former Canadian Defense Minister Paul Hellyer has publicly stated that multiple extraterrestrial civilizations have visited Earth, and that many are not hostile, but concerned about human self-destruction.
Even Pentagon documents (like the now-declassified "UFO/UAP threat assessments") point less to alien invasion and more to unknown capabilities.
Dr. Steven Greer, founder of the Disclosure Project, has taken it further, arguing that most extraterrestrial intelligences are non-hostile, and that fear-based narratives serve more to justify militarization than reflect reality. He claims hundreds of military and intelligence insiders support this perspective, and has pioneered CE5 protocols: meditative methods to initiate peaceful contact through consciousness and intention.
Jacques Vallée, a long-time researcher and advisor to the U.S. government, has explored the UAP phenomenon for decades—through a radically different lens. He suggests many encounters may not be extraterrestrial in the classic sense, but interdimensional, or even consciousness-based experiences shaped by our own perception.
Whether you align with Luis Elizondo’s caution, Vallée’s multidimensional hypotheses, or Dr. Steven Greer’s call for peaceful, consciousness-based contact, the takeaway remains the same: there is no consensus. There is credible data. There are conflicting theories. And there is a growing field of uncertainty.
So who do we believe?
Consciousness May Be the Missing Piece
Here’s what almost no one is talking about:
Many of the most compelling UAP encounters include reports of telepathy, time distortion, light-body activation, and consciousness shifts—phenomena that Vallée and others believe may reveal not just advanced technology, but interaction with a broader dimensional reality we don’t yet understand.
As physicist Dr. Rudy Schild of the Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics has said, "There is evidence that consciousness is a non-local field that interacts with quantum phenomena."
If that’s true, contact is not just technological. It’s energetic. And the real disclosure may be about what we are, not just who they are.
Navigating the Noise
Part of why this topic feels chaotic is because experts contradict each other. Greer speaks of peaceful civilizations. Vallée urges caution. Elizondo flags unknown threat potential. Military records suggest intervention, not invasion.
And that’s the paradox: we have more information than ever—and still, no clarity.
So what do we do?
We turn inward.
The deeper invitation is not just to look to the sky, but to explore your own resonance. If something feels off, question the source. If something feels true, sit with it. Trust your nervous system, your body, your intuition.
Stay open. Stay discerning. You don’t have to pick a side. You only have to stay aligned with your own frequency of truth.
What Happens If Humanity Believes?
If it became undeniable that we are not alone—that we are one of many intelligent civilizations—the fallout wouldn’t just be scientific. It would be existential.
Religious doctrines, political systems, economic priorities—everything would be up for re-evaluation.
But maybe that’s the point.
A humanity that knows it’s part of a greater cosmic ecosystem might evolve beyond tribalism. Or it might fracture. The path depends on how ready we are to expand our definition of self, soul, and species.
Final Transmission
This conversation is no longer about tinfoil hats and grainy saucer photos. It’s about power, perception, and possibility.
Aliens, UAPs, non-human intelligences—whether they are here or not, the idea of them is already changing us.
Because to ask, "Are we alone?" is to open the door to, "What else don’t we know yet about ourselves?"
And in that question—we may find a frequency that transcends fear and anchors us in cosmic consciousness.
Suggested Resources
Passport to Magonia by Jacques Vallée
The Day After Roswell by Philip J. Corso
The Phenomenon (James Fox documentary)
A Tear in the Sky by Caroline Cory
U.S. Government UAP Report (ODNI, 2022)
Disclosure and Unacknowledged by Dr. Steven Greer
